Jindal Worldwide Ltd operates in the textiles sector, specializing in the manufacturing of denim fabric, premium shirting’s, yarn dyeing, bottom weights, and home textiles. However, a potential red flag emerges as promoter-linked entities appear to control over 75% of the shares, despite the official promoter holding being 59.80%.
Promoter Holding vs Public Holding – What’s Happening?
Promoter Holding: 59.80% (which is within SEBI’s limit, as the maximum allowed is 75%)
Public Holding: Officially 40.20%, but a deeper analysis of “public shareholders” reveals that a significant number of them have the Agarwal surname.
This indicates that even in the public category, a large portion of the stake is possibly held by promoters’ relatives or close associates!
Why is This a Red Flag?
Actual Free Float is Very Low
While public holding appears to be 40.20%, if a significant portion of it is held by relatives of promoters, the real free float in the market is much lower.
This means that despite appearing compliant with SEBI norms, the stock remains under the indirect control of the promoters.
Price Manipulation Risk
When fewer shares are genuinely available in the market, the stock price can be manipulated easily. Due to low liquidity, it becomes easier to artificially push the stock price up or down.
Public Holding is Increasing – But Is It Genuine?
Are promoters reducing their direct stake and shifting it under “public” by transferring shares to relatives and close associates?
If this is happening, it could be a disguised way of maintaining control while appearing to comply with regulations.
Is This a SEBI Violation?
As per SEBI rules, promoters cannot hold more than 75% stake directly.
However, if the remaining stake is held by family members or associates under the “public” category, it could be a regulatory loophole.
If this pattern continues and suspicious price movements are observed, SEBI may investigate the matter.
Key Takeaways for Investors
Retail investors must analyze shareholding patterns carefully, as lack of transparency can be a serious concern.
A stock with low real free float is vulnerable to sharp price movements, including sudden spikes or crashes.
In Jindal Worldwide’s case, a significant portion of the so-called “public” holding may actually be controlled by promoters’ associates, raising concerns about price manipulation.
Investors should be cautious and avoid investing without proper due diligence.
This unusual public shareholding pattern could be a warning sign, and investors should keep an eye on further developments before making any decisions.
